(jdk10) RFR(xxs): 8176872: [s390] wrong pc shown in error logs

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Apr 4 07:25:20 UTC 2017


Hi Thomas,

On 4/04/2017 3:54 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi Dmitry, David,
>
> sorry for dropping the ball on this one. Here the latest version - I
> only fixed the cosmetics Dmitry requested:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8176872-s390-wrong-pc-in-errorlogs/jdk10-webrev.02/webrev/

Looks okay. I'm a little unsure about only fixing this in the shared 
code for non-s390. But I guess we can deal with other platforms later.

Thanks,
David
-----

> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> Kind Regards, Thomas
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Dmitry Samersoff
> <dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com <mailto:dmitry.samersoff at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thomas,
>
>     Looks good to me,
>
>     We may consider to always use info->si_addr.
>
>     Nits:
>
>     vmError_posix.cpp
>
>     118:
>       Please change uc ? ... to   (uc == NULL) ? ...
>
>     122: (and os_linux_s390.cpp:513)
>
>       Space missed after (address) ...
>
>
>     -Dmitry
>
>
>     On 2017-03-21 16:40, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > please take a look at this tiny fix. It fixes the pc shown as faulting
>     > address for SIGILL and SIGFPE in hs_err files.
>     >
>     > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176872
>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176872>
>     >
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8176872-s390-wrong-pc-in-errorlogs/jdk10-webrev.00/webrev/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8176872-s390-wrong-pc-in-errorlogs/jdk10-webrev.00/webrev/>
>     >
>     > When determining the crash pc, in all posix platform signal
>     handlers pc is
>     > taken from the context. However, context.pc on zlinux points to the
>     > instruction *after* the faulting op. The correct way, according to
>     POSIX,
>     > would be to take the address from siginfo_t->si_addr for signals
>     SIGILL,
>     > SIGFPE.
>     >
>     > (actually, this patch would make sense for all POSIX platforms,
>     but only
>     > s390 seems to show this error, so I leave the patch local to s390.)
>     >
>     > Kind Regards, Thomas
>     >
>
>
>     --
>     Dmitry Samersoff
>     Oracle Java development team, Saint Petersburg, Russia
>     * I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the sources.
>
>


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list