RFR 8185103: TestThreadDumpMonitorContention.java crashed due to SIGSEGV in G1SATBCardTableModRefBS::write_ref_field_pre_work
harold seigel
harold.seigel at oracle.com
Thu Aug 3 18:01:02 UTC 2017
Thanks George, for the review!
Harold
On 8/3/2017 2:00 PM, George Triantafillou wrote:
> Hi Harold,
>
> Looks good.
>
> -George
>
> On 8/3/2017 9:03 AM, harold seigel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please review this JDK-10 fix for JDK-8185103. The problem occurred
>> because classes were being put on the fixup_module_field_list before
>> their mirror field was set. If a (different) thread called method
>> patch_javabase_entries() before the class's mirror field was set then
>> this would cause a SIGSEGV because patch_javabase_entries()
>> eventually calls obj_field_put() which tries to dereference the
>> class's mirror field.
>>
>> This change fixes the problem by setting the class's mirror field
>> before putting the class on the fixup_module_field_list.
>>
>> Open Webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8185103/webrev/index.html
>>
>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8185103
>>
>> The fix was tested with the JCK Lang and VM tests, the JTreg hotspot,
>> java/io, java/lang, java/util and other tests, the co-located NSK
>> tests, and with JPRT.
>>
>> Additionally, the fix was tested by temporarily adding a
>> naked_short_sleep(50) to method initialize_mirror_fields() shortly
>> after it put a class on the fixup_module_field_list. The sleep was
>> added in order to enhance the likelihood of patch_javabase_entries()
>> being called before the class's mirror field got set. Without the
>> fix, the TestThreadDumpMonitorContent.java test and the test reported
>> in JDK-8183309 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183309>
>> reliably got the reported SIGSEGVs. With the fix, the tests passed.
>>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list