RFR(xxs): 8186199: [windows] JNI_DestroyJavaVM not covered by SEH

[coleen.phillimore at oracle.com]

Hi, I will sponsor this for you.  The code looks ok to me but I'm not 
really a windows expert.

Coleen

On 8/16/17 10:18 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Ping.. could I please have a second review and a sponsor? Thank you!
>
> Current webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8186199-
> destroyjavavm-no-seh-handler/webrev.01/webrev/
>
> ..Thomas
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Thomas Stüfe <thomas.stuefe at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> please review this tiny fix:
>>
>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186199
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/
>> 8186199-destroyjavavm-no-seh-handler/webrev.00/webrev/
>>
>> We miss __try{ } __except in JNI_DestroyJavaVM, so we run without signal
>> handler (well, SE handler) during the invocation of JNI_DestroyJavaVM.
>>
>> Thanks, Thomas
>>