(10) RFR: 8157709: NMT should use size_t version of Atomic::add

[Kim Barrett]

> On Feb 12, 2017, at 8:46 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157709
> 
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8157709/webrev/
> 
> NMT typdef'd MemoryCounterType to jlong on 64-bit and jint on 32-bit. Really it should just be size_t and in fact the typedef is not needed at all as it was only used for casting size_t's when invoking Atomic::add. So MemoryCounterType is removed. Only glitch was that using negation of an unsigned variable triggered a warning on Windows which I have had to silence with a pragma. (As unknown pragma's must be ignored I have not ifdef'd the pragma - doing so would also be a problem as warning suppression only operates on the next line, so then I'd have to push and pop the warning which would be really, really ugly.)
> 
> 
> Also as a result of this change there is no longer any use of the buggy Atomic::add(jlong) and as discussed here:
> 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2016-February/021620.html
> 
> it is simply removed.
> 
> Testing: JPRT
>         runtime/NMT
> 
> Thanks,
> David

gcc has -Wunknown-pragmas, which is enabled by -Wall.  I suspect we're
still some way from being able to build with -Wall though...

My experiments indicate that it does work to #ifdef
TARGET_COMPILER_visCPP the #pragma, even though that puts the #endif
between the #pragma and the line to be affected.  If the #ifdef causes
the #pragma to be kept, the #endif becomes a blank line, and an
intervening blank line seems to be permitted for such a #pragma.  At
least, that worked for me...

I'm okay with that part as-is though; your call.

The rest looks good.