RFR(S): 8183571: PPC64 build broken after 8178499
Stefan Karlsson
stefan.karlsson at oracle.com
Wed Jul 5 14:15:52 UTC 2017
Hi Marti,
On 2017-07-05 15:55, Doerr, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have fixed the PPC64 build:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8183571_fix_PPC64_build/webrev.00/
> (Contains minor PPC code improvements.)
>
> Please review.
Most looks good to me, but I'm not sure why this was needed because of
8178499:
- if (has_mfdscr()) {
+ if (PowerArchitecturePPC64 >= 8 && has_mfdscr()) {
I'm also not sure why you needed this change:
- (*test)(align_up(mid_of_test_area, 16), (uint64_t)0);
+ (*test)((address)align_up((intptr_t)mid_of_test_area, 16), 0);
Did you consider changing:
enum {
// stack alignment
alignment_in_bytes = 16,
// log_2(16*8 bits) = 7.
log_2_of_alignment_in_bits = 7
};
to the more type safe:
// stack alignment
static const int alignment_in_bytes = 16;
// log_2(16*8 bits) = 7.
static const int log_2_of_alignment_in_bits = 7
that way you wouldn't have to cast in code like this:
- const int frame_size_in_bytes = align_up(register_save_size,
frame::alignment_in_bytes)
+ const int frame_size_in_bytes = align_up(register_save_size,
(int)frame::alignment_in_bytes)
StefanK
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list