RFR(XS) 8184991: NMT detail diff should take memory type into account

[coleen.phillimore at oracle.com]

This seems good.   I can sponsor it for you, please send me the exported 
changeset.
Thanks,
Coleen

On 7/20/17 1:28 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>>
>>  *)  320   // Report type only it is valid
>>
>>  "Report type only *if* it is valid"?
>>
> I will fix this.
>
> -Zhengyu
>
>> Otherwise looks good.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Aleksey
>>