RFR (XS): 8181451: JDK-8174231 broke some clang builds

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Jun 2 04:55:27 UTC 2017


bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8181451
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8181451/webrev/

tl;dr: simple fix, but interesting explanation :)

The fix for 8174231 actually exposed a flaw in the os_bsd.hpp header, 
where we have this:

#ifdef __APPLE__
// Mac OS X doesn't support clock_gettime. Stub out the type, it is
// unused
typedef int clockid_t;
#endif

When building for Mac OS the clockid_t is never used (ifdef !_APPLE_) 
and so the typedef is not needed. As of Mac OS X 10.12 (Sierra) 
clock_gettime _is_ supported, but the real clockid_t is a enum - hence 
the existing typedef is incorrect (but probably harmless at runtime 
given enums are physically if not logically ints).

What was going wrong after the fix for 8174231 is that the initial use 
of clockid_t to describe the _clock_gettime_func variable was in the 
global scope (so the enum); whereas the actual assignment to that 
variable, using a cast, is in the os::Posix class scope, and the typedef 
above is also in the os class scope, and so an int. Hence the compiler 
complained that the clockid_t-enum on the left of the assignment, was 
not the same as the clockid_t-int on the right.

Thanks to Igor for finding this (we don't build or test on Mac OS X 
10.12 normally) and the initial suggested fix - which used a typedef for 
the clock_gettime function type and so ensured the types on the left and 
right of the assignment were the same (and the enum at that!).

Many thanks to Kim for solving the mystery of how the two clockid_t's on 
the same line of source code could end up being different types! After 
wading through that I really do need my upcoming vacation. :)

Oh and one final word. While OS X 10.12 now supports clock_gettime and 
CLOCK_MONOTONIC we do not use them. The time functions still use the 
mach time functions. There is still no support for 
pthread_condattr_setclock, so we don't use CLOCK_MONOTONIC there either. 
(Which is a bug waiting to happen as we want consistent use of clocks!).

Thanks,
David


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list