RFR: 8152953: ForceSafepoint operations should be more specific

[David Holmes]

On 24/05/2017 7:47 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Robbin,
> 
> It looks good modulo David's comments.
> The bug has to be targeted to 10, not 11.

Good catch. It must be targeted to 10 else a backport to 10 will be created!

Thanks,
David

> But it should not be a problem. :)
> 
> Thanks,
> Serguei
> 
> 
> On 5/23/17 11:31, Robbin Ehn wrote:
>> Hi all, please review.
>>
>> The empty ForceSafepoint operation is now specified by a subclass.
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rehn/8152953/
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8152953
>>
>> Passes hotspot_tier1
>>
>> Thanks, Robbin
>