Request for sponsor to putback fix for JDK-8201509: Zero : S390 31bit (S390 and not _LP64) atomic_copy64 inline assembler is wrong
shade at redhat.com
Fri Apr 27 14:34:17 UTC 2018
I'll do it.
In future, you don't need to start another thread for requests like these, you can just ask for the
sponsor in the same RFR thread at hotspot-dev@
On 04/27/2018 04:19 PM, Chris Phillips wrote:
> I'd like find a JDK11 committer to sponsor and putback this
> fix :
> JDK-8201509: Zero : S390 31bit (S390 and not _LP64) atomic_copy64 inline
> assembler is wrong
> Review thread:
> Testing: Builds itself on s390 31bit with some other local patches to
> avoid type mismatches.
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev