RFR: 8215451: JNI IsSameObject should not keep objects alive

[Erik Österlund]

+1 on DECORATORS_NONE.

/Erik

On 2018-12-17 16:05, Per Liden wrote:
> On 12/17/18 3:58 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> [...]
>>> I was going to suggest the explicit 0 decorator values seemed like an
>>> abstraction violation, and should instead be using the named "empty"
>>> decorator value. But I see that's called "INTERNAL_EMPTY". That seems
>>> like a (separate) bug.
>>>
>>
>> I had the exact same thought and I talked to Erik about it. We agreed 
>> that we should rename INTERNAL_EMPTY to something less "internal". 
>> How about DECORATORS_NONE?
>>
>
> Filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215492
>
> It's a 1 minute job to fix, once we agree on a new name for it. Feel 
> free to make suggestions. DECORATORS_NONE is the best I've come up 
> with so far, but I'm open to suggestions.
>
> cheers,
> Per