RFR(XXS): 8194652 VMError::print_native_stack() is missing an os::is_first_C_frame() check
Daniel D. Daugherty
daniel.daugherty at oracle.com
Mon Jan 8 14:50:13 UTC 2018
Hi Thomas!
Thanks for the (R)eview!
Dan
On 1/8/18 9:46 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> looks good. I ran into the problem myself before. Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Best Regards, Thomas
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty
> <daniel.daugherty at oracle.com <mailto:daniel.daugherty at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I need a (R)eviewer to chime in on this thread...
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On 1/5/18 11:11 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have a very small fix for a bug in
> VMError::print_native_stack() along
> with a new test. I ran into the bug while working on some
> stack walking
> code. For some reason, the bug only reproduces on OSX and
> Solaris X64.
>
> 8194652 VMError::print_native_stack() is missing an
> os::is_first_C_frame() check
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194652
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194652>
>
> Webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dcubed/8194652-webrev/jdk11-0/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Edcubed/8194652-webrev/jdk11-0/>
>
>
> The new test has been verified to fail on OSX and Solaris X64
> without the
> fix in place and, with the fix in place, it passes on all
> Mach5 platforms.
> I've tested the fix with a Mach5 hs-tier[1-3] run and there
> are no unknown
> failures.
>
> Thanks, in advance, for any comments, questions, or suggestions.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list