RFR(XXS) 8199741: NMT: Tag safepoint polling pages
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Mon Mar 19 17:31:08 UTC 2018
Hi,
Do I need second reviewer for this trivial change?
BTW, Submit-hs test came back clean.
Mach5 mach5-one-zgu-JDK-8199741-20180319-1538-14990: Builds PASSED.
Testing SUCCESSFUL.
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
On 03/16/2018 11:50 AM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>
> Yay, a quick code review. Is there a better mt tag than mtInternal
> though? There are too many mtInternal allocations. Can you add
> mtSafepoint or mtSynchronize (or better name?) and we could have an RFE
> to make some of these into the same:
>
> share/runtime/semaphore.hpp:class Semaphore : public CHeapObj<mtInternal> {
> share/runtime/mutex.hpp:class Monitor : public CHeapObj<mtInternal> {
> share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp: return AllocateHeap(size, mtInternal);
> share/runtime/objectMonitor.cpp: char * knobs = (char *) os::malloc(sz
> + 2, mtInternal);
> share/runtime/monitorChunk.cpp: _monitors =
> NEW_C_HEAP_ARRAY(BasicObjectLock, number_on_monitors, mtInternal);
>
> Or even mtOS so we can move some of the os allocations to this category?
>
> Why is nothing simple?! :)
>
> Coleen
>
> On 3/16/18 11:34 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> A trivial fix to add NMT tag to Safepoint poll pages.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199741
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8199741/webrev.00/
>>
>> Test:
>> Eyeball NMT output on Linux x64.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list