RFR(XS) 8189140 - SystemDictionaryShared::initialize() should be renamed to be more meaningful

[coleen.phillimore at oracle.com]

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iklam/jdk11/8189140-rename-system-dict-shared-initialize.v01/src/hotspot/share/classfile/systemDictionaryShared.cpp.udiff.html

This looks good.  This is a pattern that's used in other places, and it 
would be better to not initialize these at startup in thread.cpp.

Coleen

On 5/15/18 2:07 AM, Ioi Lam wrote:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189140
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iklam/jdk11/8189140-rename-system-dict-shared-initialize.v01/ 
>
>
> Summary:
>
> 1. Removed the forced initialization of a few classes used by AppCDS 
> at JVM start-up.
>    Instead, initialize these class on demand by calling 
> InstanceKlass::initialize, which
>    is a quick no-op if the class is already initialized.
>
> 2. The only initialization left is that of a global lock. So I renamed 
> the function
>    to SystemDictionaryShared::initialize_locks().
>
> 3. I moved the call of this function from 
> SystemDictionary::compute_java_loaders() to
> SystemDictionary::initialize() where it seems to fit.
>
> Testing with hs-tiers 1 and 2.
>
> Thanks
> - Ioi