RFR (S): 8218483: Crash in "assert(_daemon_threads_count->get_value() > daemon_count) failed: thread count mismatch 5 : 5"
David Holmes
david.holmes at oracle.com
Tue Apr 2 20:55:01 UTC 2019
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for taking a look at this.
On 3/04/2019 5:41 am, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> first thanks for the good analysis!
>
> Is this not a problem with the usage of setDaemon():
>
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/Thread.html#setDaemon(boolean)
>
> "This method must be invoked before the thread is started."
Not the usage as such, but there is a problem with setDaemon - as per:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8221657
The test that causes the crash in the VM deliberately tests a case where
it expects to get the IllegalThreadStateException.
> I think the real solution would be for setDaemon to distinguish between
> not-yet-started, running and finished. It should not use isAlive(). It
> should throw an exception if it has been started, regardless of whether
> it finished already or not.
Yes that fix is needed at the Java level. The use of isAlive() pre-dates
the existence of Thread.State.
But a change at the Java level may be some time coming given this is a
day one bug in the spec and implementation of Thread.setDaemon, so I
wanted to address this quickly in the VM as we are seeing these crashes
in testing.
Thanks,
David
> Not sure. Its late, I may not be thinking straight.
>
> Cheers, Thomas
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:33 AM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com
> <mailto:david.holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8218483
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8218483/webrev/
>
> A bug in Thread.setDaemon (JDK-8221657) means that the daemon state
> of a
> thread can change after the thread is !isAlive() at the Java level. If
> this happens before the VM call to ThreadService::remove_thread then we
> have a situation where we incremented the thread counters when the
> thread was not a daemon, and we decrement the thread counters when the
> thread is a daemon - and so the counters are out of sync and the
> assertion fires.
>
> The simple fix is to capture the daemon state of the thread while it is
> still alive and to pass that through to Threads::remove and thus
> ThreadService::remove_thread.
>
> Testing:
> - manual test with modified VM (to delay Threads::remove call)
> as per
> the bug report
> - mach 5 tiers 1-3
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list