RFR(T) 8219244: NMT: Move safepoint related memory allocations from mtInternal to mtSafepoint

[zgu at redhat.com]

Hi Coleen,

On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 15:13 -0500, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
> This is such a small allocation, I think it makes more sense to add
> it to mtThread.
> > 

I get it if there is not mtSafepoint category, it is not worth to have
one for a small allocation, but we already have it. Why is it better to
add to mtThread?

Thanks,

-Zhengyu


> 
Coleen
> 
> On 2/18/19 3:12 PM, zgu at redhat.com wrote:
> > There is only one instance I can find.
> > 
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8219244
> > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8219244/webrev.00/
> > 
> > Test:
> > 
> >    hotspot_nmt on Linux x64 (fastdebug and release)
> >    JDK-submit tests.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > -Zhengyu
> 
>