RFR 8215901: [TESTBUG] TestCheckedEnsureLocalCapacity.java fails intermittently

Harold David Seigel harold.seigel at oracle.com
Tue Jan 8 17:05:19 UTC 2019


Thanks!

Harold

On 1/8/2019 12:04 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> On 1/8/19 11:25 AM, Harold David Seigel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Please review this updated webrev that removes the '^' from 
>> '^WARNING:'.  I also removed the trailing blank.
>>
>>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8215901.2/webrev/index.html
>>
>
> Thumbs up on the re-review.
>
> Dan
>
>
>> Thanks, Harold
>>
>> On 1/8/2019 9:41 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>> Sorry, I just took another look at the test:
>>>
>>> This line is also a problem:
>>>
>>>   L3:     private static final String WARNING = "^WARNING: ";
>>>
>>> Because of the '^' anchor, you could miss an unexpected "WARNING: " in
>>> the "no warnings" test case.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/8/19 9:38 AM, Harold David Seigel wrote:
>>>> Thanks Dan!
>>>>
>>>> I'll add the comment before pushing.
>>>>
>>>> Harold
>>>>
>>>> On 1/8/2019 9:36 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>>>>> On 1/8/19 9:27 AM, Harold David Seigel wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review this small fix for JDK-8215901.  The test passes if 
>>>>>> its output matches a certain pattern.  The fix, suggested by Dan, 
>>>>>> changes the pattern to not require it to be at the beginning of a 
>>>>>> line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8215901/webrev/
>>>>>
>>>>> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/jni/checked/TestCheckedEnsureLocalCapacity.java 
>>>>>
>>>>>     Perhaps a comment above the variable:
>>>>>
>>>>>     // Not anchored to the beginning of the line to allow match 
>>>>> with interleaved output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thumbs up. Your call on whether to add the comment or something 
>>>>> like it.
>>>>> Don't need to see another webrev.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215901
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The fix was tested by running the test over 600 times on multiple 
>>>>>> platforms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Harold
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list