RFR (S): 8213397: Stack dump should show more clearly when a thread is blocked on a class initialization monitor
Robbin Ehn
robbin.ehn at oracle.com
Mon Jan 14 08:54:58 UTC 2019
Hi David, looks good.
In the test I would prefer e.g. semaphore acquire/release instead of boolean
ready with sleep. (in this case it doesn't seem to make much of a difference)
So do as you wish, I do not need to see a new webrev if you choose to change.
Thanks, Robbin
On 1/14/19 7:01 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213397
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8213397/webrev/
>
> Please review this simple enhancement to improve the stack trace information
> when a thread is blocked doing a (logical) Object.wait on the monitor associated
> with Class static initialization.
>
> Details are in the bug report but basically we record, in a thread-local
> variable, the name of the class before the "wait" and clear it after, thus
> allowing the stack dump code to query it if it appears we may be in that situation.
>
> In InstanceKlass::initialize_impl I also refactored the code a tiny bit to make
> use of the JavaThread reference to the current thread.
>
> A new test using jstack was also added.
>
> Testing:
> - mach5 tiers 1 - 3
> - the new test on Windows/Linux/OSX x86 and Solaris sparc, in regular and
> Xcomp mode
> - All jstack/stack-dump using tests I could see (linux x64):
> - runtime/Thread
> - serviceability/sa/
> - serviceability/tmtools/jstack/
> - vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/sampling/
> - vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/MonitorWaited/ .
> - vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/GetOwnedMonitorInfo/
>
> Thanks,
> David
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list