RFR 8224137: Analyze and port invocation tests to jtreg and co-locate to jdk repo

Lois Foltan lois.foltan at oracle.com
Tue Jun 18 12:52:21 UTC 2019



On 6/17/2019 2:57 PM, Harold Seigel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review this JDK-14 change to move the invocation tests written 
> by Vladimir Ivanov into the JDK repo and make them runnable using JTReg.
>
> This webrev adds three tests, invokeinterfaceTests.java, 
> invokespecialTests.java, and invokevirtualTests.java.  Each tests run 
> its set of sub-tests twice, once using class file version 51 and once 
> using the current class file version.

Hi Harold,

This looks great.  I agree with your approach of initially getting these 
valuable tests working in jtreg and then address improvements via future 
RFEs.

>
> Open Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hseigel/bug_8224137/webrev/
>
> JBS Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224137
>
> The tests were tested on Linux-x64, Solaris, Windows, and Mac OS X.
>
> The original tests can be found attached to JDK-8163974 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8163974>. Besides the 
> changes needed for JTReg and adding copyrights, I made the following 
> additional changes.
>
> 1. The tests now use the JDK's asm support instead of providing its own
>    asm libraries.
> 2. Only sub-test failures are written to the .jtr files.  Writing all
>    sub-test results caused JTReg to truncate the output.

Just curious.  Is there a way, via a command line option maybe, to see 
the full (success & failure) results?  I could see where maybe this 
would be valuable when investigating possible future invocation changes.

Thanks,
Lois

> 3. Changed src/invokeinterface/Checker.java to skip private methods
>    when looking for an overloading method.
>
> The tests contain "TODO" comments and other thing needing clean-up.  
> These will be addressed in a future RFE.
>
> I put the tests into hs-tier3 because the invokeInterfaceTests.java 
> test can run for up to 10 minutes (on Mac).  The other two tests take 
> only 1-2 minutes.  Is there a better tier for these tests?
>
> Thanks, Harold
>



More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list