RFR 8220570: Additonal trace when native thread creation fails

[Lindenmaier, Goetz]

Hi Ralf,
 
looks good to me.

Thanks,
  Goetz.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hotspot-runtime-dev <hotspot-runtime-dev-
> bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Schmelter, Ralf
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. März 2019 11:07
> To: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>; hotspot-runtime-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: RFR 8220570: Additonal trace when native thread
> creation fails
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> here is the new webrev. We now trace at the info level and include the number
> of Java threads.
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rschmelter/webrevs/8220570/webrev.2/
> 
> Best regards,
> Ralf
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com>
> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. März 2019 06:51
> To: Schmelter, Ralf <ralf.schmelter at sap.com>; hotspot-runtime-
> dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: RFR 8220570: Additonal trace when native thread creation fails
> 
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> On 19/03/2019 8:14 pm, Schmelter, Ralf wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > what about lowering the log level to info? Would you think the amount of
> detail would be OK for that? And if yes, would the first implementation (the
> one with the lengthy output) be OK, since it saves quiet a lot of program code?
> 
> The original version at "info" would be acceptable to me.
> 
> But as Goetz suggested, adding a small amount of additional detail to
> the existing warning (e.g. number of running threads) is also okay.
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> -----
> 
> > Best regards,
> > Ralf
> >