RFR: JDK-8223599: minimal build failed after JDK-8185525
Ao Qi
aoqi at loongson.cn
Thu May 9 18:06:59 UTC 2019
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 12:56 AM Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/9/19 4:12 PM, Ao Qi wrote:
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:43 PM David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/05/2019 9:12 pm, Wang Haomin wrote:
> >>> Hi Aleksey, David,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your suggestion. However, build is failed when using
> >>> "--with-jvm-features=-jfr --with-jvm-variants=server
> >>> --with-debug-level=release --disable-precompiled-headers".
> >>> I made a litter modification. Could you review it?
> >>>
> >>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8223599/webrev.02/
> >>
> >> shenandoahCollectionSet.cpp was not altered by 8185525, so while I
> >> understand your desire to make this fix, it doesn't seem right to do it
> >> under the current bug as currently described. The issue with disabling
> >> PCH would not seem to be related to the minimal build at all.
> >
> > Indeed. The initial desire is to fix the issue introduced by 8185525.
> > Should I change the description or file another issue?
>
> I'd say split it out. We would backport the Shenandoah issue.
Splitted:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8223599/webrev.03/
Here is the new bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223651
Is a new review thread needed for JDK-8223651? Webrev is here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8223651/webrev.00/
In addition, I found it seems build with --disable-precompiled-headers
broken again (maybe introduced by JDK-8223136) during test. I filed
JDK-8223653 and will have a further loot at it tomorrow.
Thanks,
Ao Qi
>
> -Aleksey
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list