RFR(L) 8223320: [AOT] jck test api/javax_script/ScriptEngine/PutGet.html fails when test classes are AOTed
Igor Veresov
igor.veresov at oracle.com
Thu May 30 22:29:30 UTC 2019
> On May 30, 2019, at 2:15 PM, Vladimir Kozlov <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> CCing to runtime group too.
>
> So you went hard and correct way ;-)
Well, there isn’t much of choice… Must abide the spec.
>
> deoptimization.cpp next #ifdef sequence is strange since we support only 64-bit on SPARC:
>
> +#ifdef _LP64
> + jlong res = (jlong)low->get_int();
> +#else
> +#ifdef SPARC
>
Right. I guess JVMCI and AOT will never support 32 bit, so I’ll just remove it.
> Also the code here is guarded by INCLUDE_JVMCI but it should be applicable to AOT code too. Right? May be || INCLUDE_AOT?
>
Good point, will add that.
> Please, add more comment. For example add one in aotLoader.cpp for initialize_box_caches() to explain why we need to eager initialize caches for AOT.
>
Ok.
New webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8223320/webrev.01/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8223320/webrev.01/>
igor
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
> On 5/30/19 12:33 PM, Igor Veresov wrote:
>> Graal models boxing (a call to valueOf()) as a BoxNode. If scalarized, it is encoded in the debug info as an allocation of a box object. However, for certain ranges of values the box object has to come from caches. The reason is that for these values JLS guarantees the identity of the boxes.
>> The fix essentially propagates the information on whether the Box is a result of Box.valueOf() or new Box() to the deoptimization machinery that checks if the object is in the range that should be in a cache and gets it from there instead of allocating it.
>> Mach5: tier1-6, tier2-6 with Graal
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iveresov/8223320/webrev.00/
>> I’d like to push all this into JDK13 first and then follow up with a change to the upstream Graal.
>> Thanks,
>> igor
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list