RFR [14]: 8232207: Linux os::available_memory re-reads cgroup configuration on every invocation
Severin Gehwolf
sgehwolf at redhat.com
Tue Oct 15 14:33:51 UTC 2019
Hi Claes,
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 11:12 +0200, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on a Linux system with container support, os::available_memory will read
> cgroup configuration files from /proc to determine max memory limits.
> This leads to measurable memory overheads in some places, e.g., JIT
> compiler threads will poll os::available_memory between compilation to
> determine if we need to reduce the number of compiler threads.
>
> Overhead from polling these /proc files can take up to 5% of total CPU
> resource usage during startup and warmup.
Would there be a way to reproduce this myself? What did you use to
measure this? It would come in handy for the cgroups v2 work I'm doing.
How does this compare to -XX:-UseContainerSupport runs?
Aside: It seems we'd need similar work for
OSContainer::active_processor_count(). Or rather, cpu_quota(),
cpu_period() and cpu_shares() functions. See:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227006
I'll give using a similar approach for active_processor_count() a shot.
Thanks,
Severin
> This patch caches the max memory limit and adds a very short (20ms)
> grace time re-reading it from cgroup config files. This is enough to
> reduce the overhead to be more or less undetectable on my system, while
> not significantly reducing responsiveness to configuration changes.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232207
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8232207/open.00/
>
> Testing: tier1-3 (with a 1s grace time, rerunning a sanity test with
> 20ms)
>
> Thanks!
>
> /Claes
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list