[16] RFR 8252250: isnanf is obsolete

[Mikael Vidstedt]

Looks good, thanks for doing the necessary research!

Cheers,
Mikael

> On Aug 25, 2020, at 1:21 AM, Aleksei Voitylov <aleksei.voitylov at bell-sw.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> in preparation for a review request for Alpine Linux JEP [1] it was
> suggested [2] to send RFRs which are not specific to musl or busybox for
> review upstream as separate patches.
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8252250
> Fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avoitylov/webrev.8252250/
> 
> ifnanf is obsolete [3], and musl does not define it. Proof of
> correctness of replacement of isnanf with isnan for all practical
> versions of gcc and llvm is provided in a comment to [4]. A backport of
> this change to 14 passes JCK and shows no jtreg regressions on Linux.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Aleksei
> 
> 
> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/386
> [2]
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/portola-dev/2020-August/000471.html
> [3] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/isnanf.3.html
> [4] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178689
> 
>