RFR: 8257794: Zero: assert(istate->_stack_limit == istate->_thread->last_Java_sp() + 1) failed: wrong on Linux/x86_32

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.java.net
Mon Dec 7 07:59:12 UTC 2020


On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 07:38:03 GMT, Jie Fu <jiefu at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Hold on a sec, I meant to see why the assert is there, and why it is in that form, and why it is `IA32_ONLY`. It should either be a generic assert (if it is good assert), or removed completely (if it is a superfluous assert). Code history should reveal the answer to that...
>
>> Hold on a sec, I meant to see why the assert is there, and why it is in that form, and why it is `IA32_ONLY`. It should either be a generic assert (if it is good assert), or removed completely (if it is a superfluous assert). Code history should reveal the answer to that...
> 
> The assert seems to be there at the creation of the OpenJDK repo.
> It was checked in at the second commit:
> commit 8153779ad32d1e8ddd37ced826c76c7aafc61894
> Author: J. Duke <duke at openjdk.org>
> Date:   Sat Dec 1 00:00:00 2007 +0000
> 
>     Initial load
> 
> I had checked the debug version of jdk8's zero on Linx/x86_32 finding that it crashed due to the same reason.
> Maybe, the debug version of zero for x86_32 was broken at the very beginning.

All right, this makes more sense to me. @dholmes-ora, could you do us a favor and see why this line: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/share/interpreter/zero/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp#L422

...was added? We don't have access to pre-OpenJDK history to get it ourselves.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1637


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list