RFR: 8258054: runtime/sealedClasses/GetPermittedSubclassesTest.java fails w/ jdk17

[Harold Seigel]

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:04:01 GMT, Joe Darcy <darcy at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I'm assuming there's no (good) way to pass in that version as a variable instead of hardcoding it?
>
>> 
>> 
>> I'm assuming there's no (good) way to pass in that version as a variable instead of hardcoding it?
> 
> To my knowledge, such a mechanism does not currently exist. Perhaps we should build one :-)

I don't know of such a mechanism.  For preview feature tests containing 
jasm and jcod files, we would only need a mechanism that would put in 
the latest supported major version when they are being compiled.

Harold

On 12/10/2020 4:04 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
>
>     I'm assuming there's no (good) way to pass in that version as a
>     variable instead of hardcoding it?
>
> To my knowledge, such a mechanism does not currently exist. Perhaps we 
> should build one :-)
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/1738*issuecomment-742797926__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kzsgs3QbFbaP9APlVDPcwzfyAtoHetEKnr_3A_EJmwil5SyyiruLLmzP2bw7FxkKmg$>, 
> or unsubscribe 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOXZ7OTDNLGIH6RHYMNQGZ3SUEZVDANCNFSM4UVLY7MQ__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kzsgs3QbFbaP9APlVDPcwzfyAtoHetEKnr_3A_EJmwil5SyyiruLLmzP2bxB2vyxHg$>.
>

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1738