RFR (T) 8250519: [REDO] Move mirror oops from Universe into OopStorage
Ioi Lam
ioi.lam at oracle.com
Sat Jul 25 02:48:29 UTC 2020
On 7/24/20 7:22 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Ioi,
>
> On 25/07/2020 9:59 am, Ioi Lam wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/24/20 4:52 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Hi Coleen,
>>>
>>> On 25/07/2020 7:07 am, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>> Summary: The original patch but add a null pointer check so an
>>>> OopHandle is not created if a NULL is read from the archive.
>>>>
>>>> If a NULL is read from the archive, we shouldn't create an
>>>> OopHandle for it because one will be created in
>>>> initialize_basic_type_mirrors. The assert added in the previous
>>>> patch I pushed detected that.
>>>
>>> Your fix to skip NULL seems reasonable but I'm left confused as to
>>> when and why we will find NULL for these basic type mirrors. Is it
>>> only the reference types that will be NULL?
>>>
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> The null skipping happens here:
>>
>> 263 if (f->reading()) {
>> 264 f->do_oop(&mirror_oop); // read from archive
>> 265 assert(oopDesc::is_oop_or_null(mirror_oop), "is oop");
>> 266 // Only create an OopHandle for non-null mirrors
>> 267 if (mirror_oop != NULL) {
>> 268 _mirrors[i] = OopHandle(vm_global(), mirror_oop);
>> 269 }
>>
>> where the f->do_oop() will read an archived oop from the CDS heap.
>> There are cases where the a NULL is returned inside mirror_oop:
>>
>> (1) The CDS image was created WITHOUT an archived heap (this could
>> happen when you run -Xshare:dump with a GC or compressed oop encoding
>> that's not compatible with the archived heap).
>>
>> (2) The CDS image has an archived heap, but the current VM is using a
>> GC or compressed oop encoding that's not compatible with the archived
>> heap.
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'm having trouble seeing the equivalence
> of the old Universe::serialize code and the new version. The new
> version seems to perform both writing and reading - which seem odd for
> something called "serialize". ??
>
CDS "serialize" is used for both read and writing. It's probably a bad
name but has been there since the beginning of CDS ....
Thanks
- Ioi
> Thanks,
> David
> -----
>
>> Thanks
>> - Ioi
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>>>
>>>> incremental change to original change:
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8250519.01.incr/webrev
>>>> full webrev at
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8250519.01/webrev
>>>>
>>>> Retested with tier1-3.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Coleen
>>>>
>>>>
>>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list