[16] RFR(T) 8248426: NMT: VirtualMemoryTracker::split_reserved_region() does not properly update summary counting
Zhengyu Gu
zgu at redhat.com
Mon Jun 29 14:29:10 UTC 2020
Hi Thomas,
On 6/29/20 2:30 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> - splitting the reserved region
>
> Could we not simply add the call
> to VirtualMemorySummary::record_released_memory(size,
> reserved_rgn->flag()); to
> VirtualMemoryTracker::split_reserved_region() instead?
I assume you could. Then removing and adding reserved region calls
are asymmetrical.
For this particular case, remove_released_region() turns out to be
exactly what you suggested, since reserved_rgn->same_region(addr, size)
== true.
...
VirtualMemorySummary::record_released_memory(size, reserved_rgn->flag());
...
return _reserved_regions->remove(rgn);
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:54 PM Zhengyu Gu <zgu at redhat.com
> <mailto:zgu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review this trivial patch that fixes summary counting in
> VirtualMemoryTracker::split_reserved_region().
>
> The method uses internal method to remove a reserved region,
> which does
> not update counting information. It should use high level tracking
> method VirtualMemoryTracker::remove_released_region() instead.
>
> Without patch, NMT summary reports uncategorized memory, e.g.
>
> - Unknown (reserved=1060416KB, committed=0KB)
> (mmap: reserved=1060416KB,
> committed=0KB)
>
>
>
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248426
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/JDK-8248426/webrev.00/
>
> Test:
> hotspot_nmt
> Submit test in progress
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list