RFR(xs): 8245035: Clean up os::split_reserved_memory()
Stefan Karlsson
stefan.karlsson at oracle.com
Tue May 19 06:03:20 UTC 2020
On 2020-05-19 06:41, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>
> Hi Coleen, Stefan,
>
> New version:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8245035--clean-up-os--split_reserved_memory()/webrev.03/webrev/
>
> I deleted the dangling prototype to pd_split_reserved_memory and left
> everything else as it is. Still good?
Yes.
Thanks,
StefanK
>
> I had not re-added it, I had just forgotten to delete it in my earlier
> versions :(
>
> Thanks, Thomas
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:13 PM <coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
> <mailto:coleen.phillimore at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8245035--clean-up-os--split_reserved_memory()/webrev.02/webrev/src/hotspot/share/runtime/os.hpp.udiff.html
>
> It looks like you added back the declaration for
> pd_split_reserved_memory but not the definition.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8245035--clean-up-os--split_reserved_memory()/webrev.02/webrev/src/hotspot/share/runtime/os.cpp.udiff.html
>
> Still deleted.
>
> I thought that the pd version should be removed since it simply
> was an empty layer. If you want to add the asserts in os.cpp
> os::split_reserved_memory an reinstate the pd version to be empty
> for posix and release/reserve for windows, that would make sense
> to me.
>
> I like the asserts broken up like you have them in 02.
>
> Thanks,
> Coleen
>
>
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list