RFR: 8238761: Asynchronous handshakes [v4]

[Coleen Phillimore]

On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:22:58 GMT, Robbin Ehn <rehn at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I don't understand, you'd have to rearrange the initializers in the constructor too, but I don't see any order
>> dependance.  Moving over _lock  helps, so this is fine.
>
> You want a cosmetic change in the member declaration.
> I'm saying the constructor will look worse.
> 
> Im asking if you want to trade a worse constructor for that?
> (all here is extremely subjective :) )

It is subjective.  What you have is fine.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/151