RFR: 8253540: InterpreterRuntime::monitorexit should be a JRT_LEAF function
Robbin Ehn
rehn at openjdk.java.net
Wed Sep 23 15:30:51 UTC 2020
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:32:21 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
> That the monitor has already been unlocked, or is a null stacklock monitor has been already checked in the caller, so
> the code that makes it a JRT_ENTRY_NO_ASYNC is unnecessary.
> Making it a JRT_LEAF like the compiled method entries makes it safer. We know it can never safepoint and
> unintentionally install a async exception.
> Tested with tier1-6.
Marked as reviewed by rehn (Reviewer).
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/320
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list