RFR: 8252324: Signal related code should be shared among POSIX platforms [v4]

Gerard Ziemski gziemski at openjdk.java.net
Mon Sep 28 20:22:56 UTC 2020


On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 20:14:12 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> Hi Gerard,
>>> Thank you for tackling this long overdue cleanup and conciliation of the the signal management code! Great work on a
>>> tedious task.
>>> Overall this looks okay but I confess it is very hard to compare each previous platform version with the new shared
>>> version.
>> 
>> Sorry about that, I do understand how hard it was to review it and really appreciate it!
>> 
>> 
>>> I'm glad the AIX folk have take an indepth look there.
>> 
>> Me too!
>> 
>>> I have a few minor comments in specific files below.
>>> 
>>> I would also suggest naming the file posixSignal.cpp/hpp as that is the more common naming pattern.
>> 
>> I based the name on the other files in that directory, i.e.:
>> 
>> jvm_posix.cpp
>> os_posix.cpp
>> semaphore_posix.cpp
>> threadLocalStorage_posix.cpp
>> vmError_posix.cpp
>> 
>> so I introduced:
>> 
>> signals_posix.cpp
>> 
>>> Future cleanup: do we really need JVM_handle_<os>_signal to be cpu specific? I can imagine one copy of this with a few
>>> ifdefs or newly introduced os::pd_* functions.
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>> 
>> Thank you David very much for catching the merge issues and review!
>
> I will merge again with current, review the changes again looking for weird merge issue, push here, then re-test...

Darn, I closed it by mistake (I thought I was closing a comment), reopening.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/157


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list