RFR: 8305670: Performance regression in LockSupport.unpark with lots of idle threads [v7]
Daniel D. Daugherty
dcubed at openjdk.org
Tue May 9 21:55:29 UTC 2023
On Tue, 2 May 2023 21:25:18 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty <dcubed at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Address the performance regression in `LockSupport.unpark()` with the following changes:
>> - Add `FastThreadsListHandle` helper class to threadSMR.[ch]pp for quickly determining if a JavaThread* is protected by the ThreadsListHandle embedded in the new helper object.
>> - Update `Unsafe_Unpark()` to pass `java_lang_Thread::thread_acquire(thread_oop)` to a new instance of the `FastThreadsListHandle` object and only do the unpark work if the target JavaThread* is protected.
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains eight commits:
>
> - Merge branch 'JDK-8307068' into JDK-8305670
> - Merge JDK-8305670 with code review changes in JDK-8307068.
> - Merge branch 'JDK-8307068' into JDK-8305670
> - Merge branch 'jdk-21+20' into JDK-8305670
> - 8305670.with-rehn-quick-mode.cr3.patch
> - Use optimized logic in Unsafe_Unpark() instead of cv_internal_thread_to_JavaThread().
> - dholmes CR - add more comments.
> - 8305670.with-rehn-quick-mode.cr0.patch
dholmes CR - FastThreadsListHandle ctr should use java_lang_Thread::thread() instead of java_lang_Thread::thread_acquire(); clarify comments.
Passes local build and the usual local tests on my MBP13.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13519#issuecomment-1540936055
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list