RFR: 8308407: libjvm library not reproducibly comparable between vendors [v4]

[Andrew Leonard]

On Mon, 22 May 2023 08:09:22 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

> So just to be clear for any VENDOR string > 64 the resulting libjvm still won't be comparable?
> 
> Thanks.

@dholmes-ora Yes, correct, should a vendor use a --with-vendor-name "string", that exceeds 64 characters, such a libjvm would not be identically comparable due to the binary object differences caused by non-deterministic offsetting and 32bit padding.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14058#issuecomment-1556892825