RFR: 8205957: setfldw001/TestDescription.java fails with bad field value
Serguei Spitsyn
sspitsyn at openjdk.org
Mon Aug 19 23:49:54 UTC 2024
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 19:34:26 GMT, Leonid Mesnik <lmesnik at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The summary of the problem. Test is intermittently failing because can't get expected field watch event.
> The test is failing to get event in the 'setfmodw001b' thread with Xcomp only.
> I verified that frame with the method 'run' of setfmodw001b is compiled when line
> 118: setfmodw001.setWatch(4);
> is executed, however the thread is in interp_only mode. The watch events are supported by interpreter only and just ignored by compiled code.
>
> The reason of failure is race beteween setting interp_only mode in line
>
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldModificationWatch/setfmodw001.java#L75
>
> and calling method call_helper while
> the method run()
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/hotspot/jtreg/vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/SetFieldModificationWatch/setfmodw001.java#L116
>
> in newly created thread 'setfmodw001b' is invoked.
>
> The javaCalls:call are used to invoke methods from hotspot, so it might be rare issues. But still, synchronization might be improved.
> The
> void JavaCalls::call_helper(JavaValue* result, const methodHandle& method, JavaCallArguments* args, TRAPS)
>
> checks if interp_only mode is set and use 'Method::from_interpreted_entry()' if not. However the interp_only might be set later before compiled method is called (or enter first safe point?). This might happens in safepoint during transition via handshake.
> So the running thread is in interp_only mode however the run() method is compiled and executed already and never going to be deoptimized.
>
> The additional setWatch calls don't try to deptimize method that are already in interp_only mode.
>
> BTW, the when JVMCI is enabled and verified adapter exists it is also will be loaded even in interp_only mode set. There is not race here, just ignoring of interp_only mode.
>
> I run failing test with Xcomp ~1000 times and tiers1-5.
src/hotspot/share/runtime/javaCalls.cpp line 358:
> 356: #endif
> 357:
> 358: CompilationPolicy::compile_if_required(method, CHECK);
I'd like to understand what is going to happen at the line 358. Are we going to compile method with -Xcomp even though the `interp_only` mode is required? If so, do we waist cycles in doing this?
This question is not to Leonid. Maybe @dean-long could answer this, please?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20587#discussion_r1722514173
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list