Withdrawn: 8301404: Factor out os::malloc with os::realloc common code, so that we only have 1 code path

Gerard Ziemski gziemski at openjdk.org
Tue Apr 1 15:59:50 UTC 2025


On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:57:41 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This is the 2nd time I am proposing this (controversial?) change, but this time I do have performance numbers, which indicate no change in speed (using NMTBenchmark from #23786):
> 
> proposed:
> 
> time:72,642,827[ns]
> [samples:807,804] [NMT headers:382,064]
> [malloc#:588,703] [realloc#:12,462] [free#:206,639]
> memory requested:57,274,288 bytes, allocated:69,004,800 bytes
> malloc overhead:4,853,360 bytes [8.47%], NMT headers overhead:6,877,152 bytes [12.01%]
> existing code:
> 
> time:73,085,446[ns]
> [samples:807,804] [NMT headers:382,064]
> [malloc#:588,703] [realloc#:12,462] [free#:206,639]
> memory requested:57,274,288 bytes, allocated:69,004,800 bytes
> malloc overhead:4,853,360 bytes [8.47%], NMT headers overhead:6,877,152 bytes [12.01%]
> Note: the NMTBenchmark reports realloc(nullptr) as mallocs(), which is why both versions show the same count for mallocs/reallocs.
> 
> The performance is virtually the same where I sampled each test 30 times and took the best (the shortest).
> 
> This proposed change factors out the common code and simplifies both os::malloc and os::realloc. We were able to reduce malloc from 44 lines down to 8 (saving of 36 lines) and realloc from 84 to 55 (29 lines).
> 
> To me the most important part here is that we reduce the number of times that NMT has to interact with the native allocation code.

This pull request has been closed without being integrated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24189


More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev mailing list