RFR: 8354115: NMT: VMATree should not accept `uncommit` a `released` region [v2]
Afshin Zafari
azafari at openjdk.org
Fri Apr 11 12:45:03 UTC 2025
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:19:54 GMT, Gerard Ziemski <gziemski at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Afshin Zafari has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> returns invalid SummaryDiff, instead of assert.
>
> src/hotspot/share/nmt/vmatree.hpp line 183:
>
>> 181: }
>> 182: }
>> 183: bool is_valid() const {
>
> How about more descriptive name, such as `is_non_free()` or `was_allocated()`, `was_touched()` something like that to mark that this was used, `valid` is too generic?
Renamed to `has_error()`.
> test/hotspot/gtest/nmt/test_vmatree.cpp line 745:
>
>> 743:
>> 744: TEST_VM_F(NMTVMATreeTest, UncommmitReleasedRegion) {
>> 745: {
>
> I would also add this case (which is the one I used originally to find this issue):
>
>
> Tree tree;
> // 0..............................
> // 0.......40----60...............
> VMATree::SummaryDiff diff = tree.uncommit_mapping(40, 20, rd2);
> EXPECT_FALSE(diff.is_valid())
Thanks for reminding. Handling this case is also added.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24572#discussion_r2039493170
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24572#discussion_r2039492498
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list