RFR: 8372584: [Linux]: Replace reading proc to get thread user CPU time with clock_gettime [v3]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Mon Dec 1 04:03:49 UTC 2025
On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:54:24 GMT, Jonas Norlinder <jnorlinder at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Since kernel v2.6.12 the Linux ABI have had support for encoding the clock types in the last three bits. Setting bit to 001 (CPUCLOCK_VIRT) will result in the kernel returning only user time. POSIX compliant implementations of pthread_getcpuclockid for the Linux kernel defaults to construct a clockid that with 010 (CPUCLOCK_SCHED) set, which return system+user time, which is what the POSIX standard mandates, see POSIX.1-2024/IEEE Std 1003.1-2024 §3.90. This patch joins the family of glibc, musl etc. that utilities this bit pattern.
>>
>> This PR also results in improved performance and thus a reduced observer effect, especially for the 100th percentile (max).
>>
>> Before patch:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CPUTime.execute sample 7506555 0.008 ± 0.001 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.00 sample 0.008 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.50 sample 0.008 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.90 sample 0.008 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.95 sample 0.008 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.99 sample 0.012 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.999 sample 0.015 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.9999 sample 0.021 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p1.00 sample 1.030 ms/op
>>
>>
>> After patch:
>>
>> Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
>> CPUTime.execute sample 8984189 ≈ 10⁻³ ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.00 sample ≈ 10⁻³ ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.50 sample ≈ 10⁻³ ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.90 sample ≈ 10⁻³ ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.95 sample ≈ 10⁻³ ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.99 sample 0.001 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.999 sample 0.001 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p0.9999 sample 0.006 ms/op
>> CPUTime.execute:p1.00 sample 0.054 ms/op
>>
>>
>> Testing: `java/lang/management/ThreadMXBean/ThreadUserTime.java` and the added microbenchmark.
>
> Jonas Norlinder has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Remove unused imports
@JonasNorlinder this PR isn't fixing two issue. I think [JDK-8372584](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8372584) should just be closed as a duplicate of [JDK-8210452](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8210452) (which I had forgotten about and which @larry-cable did not get further with).
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28556#issuecomment-3594431428
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list