RFR: 8346866: [ASAN] memoryReserver.cpp reported applying non-zero offset to non-null pointer produced null pointer [v6]
Stefan Karlsson
stefank at openjdk.org
Tue Jan 7 11:36:47 UTC 2025
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 10:59:02 GMT, SendaoYan <syan at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> This PR add an extra loop condition check `p2u(attach_point) > stepsize` in function `HeapReserver::Instance::try_reserve_range` to make sure the loop will not wrap around, and make UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer silent. The change do not change the original logic, risk is low.
>>
>> Additional testing:
>>
>> - [x] jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3 etc., which include tests added by [PR22712](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22712)) on linux-x64 with release build
>> - [x] jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3 etc., which include tests added by [PR22712](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22712)) on linux-x64 with fastdebug build
>> - [x] jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3 etc., which include tests added by [PR22712](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22712)) on linux-aarch64 with release build
>> - [x] jtreg tests(include tier1/2/3 etc., which include tests added by [PR22712](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22712)) on linux-aarch64 with fastdebug build
>
> SendaoYan has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into jbs8346866
> - Replace "(size_t) highest_start" instead as 1
> - remove ultra empty line
> - Use offsets in the loop logic instead
> - Use offsets in the loop logic instead
> - Update the comments
> - Add "attach_point <= stepsize" check at the end of for loop, to make sanitizer silent and avoid warp around.
> - 8346866: [ASAN] memoryReserver.cpp reported applying non-zero offset to non-null pointer produced null pointer
Marked as reviewed by stefank (Reviewer).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22897#pullrequestreview-2534113438
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list