RFR: 8354887: Preserve runtime blobs in AOT code cache [v2]

[Vladimir Kozlov]

On Mon, 5 May 2025 21:13:24 GMT, Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> [8350209](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8350209) introduced the framework for storing code in aot code cache and used it for caching i2c/c2i adapters.
>> This PR extends the `AOTCodeCache` infrastructure and stores various runtime blobs (shared blobs, C1 and C2 runtime blobs) in the AOT code cache. It adds a new diagnostic flag `AOTStubCaching` to enable/disable the caching of these blobs.
>> `AOTCodeFlags.java` test is extended to cover `AOTStubCaching`.
>
> Ashutosh Mehra has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into preserve-runtime-blobs-master
>  - Address Vladimir's comments
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Remove irrelevant comment
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Fix win64 compile failures
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Fix AOTCodeFlags.java test
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Fix compile failure in minimal config
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Revert back changes that added AOTRuntimeConstants.
>    Ensure CompressedOops::base and CompressedKlssPointers::base does not
>    change in production run
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Fix merge conflicts
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Store/load AsmRemarks and DbgStrings in aot code cache
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - Add missing external address in aarch64
>    
>    Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra at redhat.com>
>  - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2a4f37cc...ba612dab

I attached hs_err file to RFE in JBS.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25019#issuecomment-2852759147