RFR: 8369622: GlobalChunkPoolMutex needs to be recursive [v2]

[Coleen Phillimore]

On Wed, 15 Oct 2025 12:15:19 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> It's my experience that the no-space indent for access modifiers is what we're moving towards. Obviously, this has clearly been done through an informal and ad-hoc process.
>
> Pity this was never discussed. I loathe having constructs that mean something not being indented. I have been using one-space indent for access modifiers. <sigh>

I've been using one-space indent for access modifiers also, and sometimes find two space indentation which doesn't really bother me that much. 0 space indentation doesn't seem that bothersome either.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27759#discussion_r2433787405