RFR: 8367848: Parallel: Use NMethodToOopClosure during Young GC [v2]
Stefan Karlsson
stefank at openjdk.org
Wed Sep 17 15:10:33 UTC 2025
On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:54:55 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang <ayang at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Replace `MarkingNMethodClosure` with `NMethodToOopClosure` during young-gc. After that, a new local `ThreadsClaimTokenScope` is introduced instead of `StrongRootsScope` to make the thread-claim-token logic visible in the current context.
>>
>> Test: tier1-3
>
> Albert Mingkun Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> review
Adding runtime because this now also touches the Threads class.
src/hotspot/share/gc/parallel/psScavenge.cpp line 237:
> 235:
> 236: class ScavengeRootsTask : public WorkerTask {
> 237: Threads::ThreadsClaimTokenScope _threads_claim_token_scope; // needed for Threads::possibly_parallel_threads_do
I wonder if this class could just be named ClaimTokenScope so that we don't need to see the word Threads twice?
Threads::ThreadsClaimTokenScope
vs
Threads::ClaimTokenScope
OTOH, the function is named `change_thread_claim_token`. Maybe the second reviewer could weigh in on this.
src/hotspot/share/runtime/threads.hpp line 112:
> 110: Threads::assert_all_threads_claimed();
> 111: }
> 112: };
I wonder if the implementation should be moved to the cpp file or if we consider this small enough to include here?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27336#issuecomment-3303451470
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27336#discussion_r2355850180
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27336#discussion_r2355850649
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list