RFR: 8370314: Update signals_posix with new Linux signal codes [v2]
David Holmes
dholmes at openjdk.org
Thu Jan 8 19:47:53 UTC 2026
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:21:42 GMT, Stefan Karlsson <stefank at openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > FWIW, @tstuefe added checks like this (minus the proposed macro) when introducing the `MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE` define in os_linux.cpp: [3699666](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/3699666c9325b38d287e1d4d2576f8e3a662ae81)
> >
> >
> > Yes but in that case we knew the problem was that it did in fact have different values.
>
> I don't see anything in the PR or JBS that supports this statement.
// Note that the value for MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE differs between architectures, but all architectures
// supported by OpenJDK share the same flag value.
But I see we also did this for SEGV_BNDERR so I will use the same pattern.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29105#issuecomment-3725474507
More information about the hotspot-runtime-dev
mailing list