<i18n dev> Review Request - 8021121: ISO 4217 Amendment Number 156

Naoto Sato naoto.sato at oracle.com
Tue Aug 6 09:45:20 PDT 2013


Yong,

There already is a logic in Currency class to deal with such a future 
transition nicely. That's what I meant.

Masayoshi,

Then it will be a regression till 1/1/2014. I don't see any problem 
using the transition logic here, IMO.

Naoto

On 8/6/13 2:13 AM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> Hi Yong,
>
> I think it's OK to use EUR without specifying the transition date-time
> for JDK 8.
>
> Thanks,
> Masayoshi
>
> On 8/6/2013 11:44 AM, Yong Huang wrote:
>> Hi Naoto,
>>
>> To place the transition logic, do you mean I need to add comments in
>> source file or do I just need to explain it in this email thread?
>>
>> The currency change will take place in January 2014 and Java 8 is
>> still not released at that time. So when Java 8 is released, the
>> currency of LV will already be changed. If I fix the bug after Jan
>> 2014, it will be near the release date of Java 8 and maybe only
>> stopper bug is allowed to fixed at that time.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Yong
>>
>> On 2013/8/6 2:32, Naoto Sato wrote:
>>> At the moment, they still use LVL for their currency, so I think the
>>> transition logic needs to be placed.
>>>
>>> Naoto
>>>
>>> On 8/4/13 7:46 PM, Yong Huang wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> This is the review request for
>>>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8021121
>>>>
>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yhuang/8021121/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Yong
>>>
>>
>



More information about the i18n-dev mailing list