<i18n dev> RFR: 8025051: Update resource files for TimeZone display names

[Aleksej Efimov]

Masayoshi,
Thank you for the detailed review and your comments. I tried to address 
all of them. The responses are below. The new webrev can be found here: 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8025051/8/webrev.01/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eaefimov/8025051/8/webrev.01/>

Michael,
As Masayoshi mentioned, we have a list of inconsistent translations in 
translation files. I suggest two approaches to resolve it: 1. Log 
different bug with all problems in translation files. 2. Wait for the 
next resource file translation update to address these problems.

-Aleksej

On 12/19/2013 12:04 PM, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 6:43 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please help to review a fix [1] for 8025051 bug [2]. The following 
>> fix includes:
>
> Common to all modified files:
> - All year ranges in the copyright header should be modified accordingly.

Fixed.

>
>>  - The translation of time zone generic names were added to all locales.
>
> I haven't fully reviewed translations, especially all \uxxxx strings. 
> But I noticed the following.
>
> Common to all TimeZoneNames_*.java:
> - The same generic abbreviation is used for the long name in MET. I 
> thought this was fixed in the root properties...

No, the "MET" is used in root properties both for generic long and short 
names. I will update these names when new translation update will be 
available.

> - Some generic names don't match the style of their standard and/or 
> daylight time names.

The same as previous. This is a first large update for generic names and 
latest translations. All inconsistency in translations will be fixed 
during next translation update.

>
> src/share/classes/sun/util/resources/de/TimeZoneNames_de.java:
> - Some generic names use "Normalzeit". Is that OK?

It's not good. But the resolution is same as previous two.

>
> src/share/classes/sun/util/resources/ja/TimeZoneNames_ja.java:
> - "Chuuk Time" isn't translated.

I think it will be translated in next translations update.

>
>>  - Time Zone names were updated according to the latest translations.
>>  - Added tz names regression test 
>> (test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone/TimeZoneNames) for a timezone names 
>> across all locales. This test compares short/long 
>> standard/daylight/generic names with translations stored in 
>> .properties files.
>
> test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone/TimeZoneNames/TimeZoneNamesTest.java:
>
> - lines 33, 34: unused imports?

Removed

> - line 75: Should it be detected as an error?

Agree, now the test will fail if there is some incorrect entries in the 
test .properties files.

> - line 108: IOException should be used as a cause. (OK to assume "not 
> found"?)

The IOException cause is added. Currently, the test will stop with 
RuntimeException, because the test file is not found.

> - lines 118 -121: Locale.getDefault() has to be replaced with 
> Locale.ROOT. Regression tests are run in different locales.

Thank you for catching this one. Fixed.

>
>>  - Tests updates to address current changes ( 
>> GenericTimeZoneNamesTest.sh and Bug6317929.java).
>
> The TODO comment in GenericTimeZoneNamesTest.sh should fully been 
> removed.

Removed

>
>>
>> The following fix was tested with JPRT build and the 'jdk_util' test 
>> set succeeded (new test is included in this test set).
>
> Have you executed all date-time related regression tests (including 
> java.time and java.text)?

Yes, I have executed the following set of tests via JTREG:
test/sun/util/calendar test/java/util/Calendar 
test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone test/sun/util/calendar 
test/closed/java/util/TimeZone test/java/util/TimeZone
  test/java/time  test/java/util/Formatter test/closed/java/util/Calendar
All tests gave "PASS" results.
Please, let me know if you think that some other tests should be executed.


>
> Thanks,
> Masayoshi
>
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8025051/8/webrev.00/
>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051
>>
>