<i18n dev> [8] Request for review: 8016824: jdk8 l10n resource file translation update 3 - jaxp

[huizhe wang]

Hi Michael,

The English came from Apache, a header was added there. So we'll need to 
add the Apache header when we update (which we plan to do in the next 
project).

The other language files were added by Oracle, reflecting the 
internationalization effort by Oracle. I think those Oracle copyright 
headers shouldn't have been removed.

Thanks,
Joe

On 6/18/2013 9:50 AM, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> The translation team uses the English file as template and updated the 
> l10n files to match. So, in these cases, the corresponding English 
> resource files do not have these copyright headers, the l10n files 
> were updated accordingly. Is this a problem?
>
> thanks,
>
> -michael
>
> On 06/17/13 23:41, huizhe wang wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Thanks for translating the new messages.
>>
>> I noticed that except XMLMessages, XMLSchemaMessages, and new 
>> language resources for XPath, others are mostly removing the Oracle 
>> copyright header.  Should the header be removed?  Other than the 
>> original English source file, others were added by Oracle.
>>
>> -Joe
>>
>> On 6/17/2013 10:56 PM, Michael Fang wrote:
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> Please help to review the changes for the following CR:
>>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8016824
>>>
>>> A list of English resource files are sent to translation group for 
>>> translation update periodically that's why these l10n resource files 
>>> have been updated.
>>>
>>> You do not need to review the translation content at this time. We 
>>> just need to make sure they do not break the build (which has been 
>>> ensured with full test builds). Follow up i18n/l10n testing will be 
>>> performed in promotion builds and i18n/l10n bugs will be reported 
>>> and addressed.
>>>
>>> The webrev is available here:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8016824/
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> -michael
>>