<i18n dev> RFR: 8026772: test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone/Bug6317929.java failing

[Masayoshi Okutsu]

The test detected the translation changes as regression, but that was 
unnecessary? I prefer to remove this test rather than changing the data.

Thanks,
Masayoshi

On 10/24/2013 12:12 AM, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi Masayoshi,
>
> At that time I was asked to have regression test to validate each 
> translation changes.
>
> With our new translation process for TimeZoneNames and new planned 
> regression tests from Aleksej for JDK-8025051 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>, I believe we can 
> remove those unnecessary tests in the future (probably together with 
> JDK-8025051 <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025051>).
>
> For now,  webrev [2] looks fine to take care of the short term 
> regression failure.
>
> thanks,
>
> -michael
>
> On 13?10?22? 09:29 ??, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>>   27  *@summary Test case for tzdata2005m support for 9 locales
>>
>> What's the purpose of this test? Do we really need to keep this one?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Masayoshi
>>
>> On 10/22/2013 8:13 PM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Can I have a review for 8026772 [1] fix.
>>> The webrev link: [2]
>>> The timezone test is failed because of the changed TimeZone names 
>>> introduced in 8025255 [3].
>>> This timezone names were changed according to updated translation 
>>> resource files introduced by 8025215 [4].
>>>
>>> The fix changes the hard-coded time zone names for 
>>> "Australia/Currie" to the values specified in 8025215.
>>>
>>> Thanks in Advance,
>>> Aleksej
>>>
>>> [1] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8026772
>>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8026772/webrev.00/
>>> [3] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025255
>>> [4] http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8025215
>>>
>>>
>>