<i18n dev> [9] RFR: 8038092: Re-examine Bidi reflective dependency on java.awt.font

Naoto Sato naoto.sato at oracle.com
Thu Jul 3 20:42:32 UTC 2014

OK, hope this is the final webrev:



On 7/3/14, 1:22 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 03/07/2014 17:59, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Ok, now I think I got what you mean. So it could regress in two ways,
>> one is what you wrote below, and the other I am seeing. So instead of
>> modifying the existing test case, I just add a new one which basically
>> is the same one in the previous webrev as follows:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8038092/webrev.3/
>> This way they can detect those two possible regressions.
> Okay, I see where you are going. To avoid duplicating the testing then
> you should have the one test run twice (two @run lines). One run could
> be with a property set that you check in the static initializer so that
> you can decide whether to preload BidiBase.
> -Alan.

More information about the i18n-dev mailing list