<i18n dev> [9] RFR: 8048123: Replace calendars.properties with another mechanism to specify a new Japanese calendar era

Naoto Sato naoto.sato at oracle.com
Wed Jul 23 16:44:00 UTC 2014

Although I believe the incorrect behavior would be very obvious ("era" 
specified in the property would simply be not used), I would agree the 
failed property be better logged.


On 7/23/14, 6:23 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 23/07/2014 09:46, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
>> Revised the webrev:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~okutsu/9/8048123/webrev.01
>> The changes from the previous one are:
>> - Changed <pre><code> (originally <pre><tt>) to <pre>{@code
>> - Replaced StringTokenizer with String.split()
>> - Eliminated RuntimeException
> The use of {@code ..} and replacing the usage of StringTokenizer look
> good me.
> I'm not so sure about silently ignoring errors in the property value,
> mostly because it would lead to incorrect behavior that is likely to be
> very difficult to track down. If there area used logging then there
> might be some hope of finding it but this isn't the case.
> -Alan

More information about the i18n-dev mailing list