From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Sat Nov  1 22:19:26 2014
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 01:19:26 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for approval: 8059206: (tz) Support
	tzdata2014i
Message-ID: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com>

Hello,

Please, approve a JDK 7u-dev backport of tzdata2014i integration fix. 
The fix is almost identical to JDK8 with one difference: there is no 
generic names in JDK7 and changes related to them are not applicable.
The JPRT build and all related timezone tests passes, JTREG tests also 
shows no failure.

Thank you,
Aleksej

JDK7 changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8059206/7/webrev.00
JDK9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/539a30f006f3
Review thread: 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-October/001566.html
JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059206

From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Mon Nov  3 09:14:23 2014
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=)
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:14:23 +0000
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for approval: 8059206: (tz) Support
	tzdata2014i
In-Reply-To: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com>
References: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5457476F.5050902@oracle.com>

Approved pending a peer review of the JDK7u changes.

regards,
Sean.

On 01/11/2014 22:19, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please, approve a JDK 7u-dev backport of tzdata2014i integration fix. 
> The fix is almost identical to JDK8 with one difference: there is no 
> generic names in JDK7 and changes related to them are not applicable.
> The JPRT build and all related timezone tests passes, JTREG tests also 
> shows no failure.
>
> Thank you,
> Aleksej
>
> JDK7 changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8059206/7/webrev.00
> JDK9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/539a30f006f3
> Review thread: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-October/001566.html
> JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059206


From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Tue Nov  4 20:23:50 2014
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:23:50 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for approval: 8059206: (tz) Support
	tzdata2014i
In-Reply-To: <5457476F.5050902@oracle.com>
References: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com> <5457476F.5050902@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <545935D6.2010100@oracle.com>

Hi,

Can I ask for the review of this almost-unaltered JDK7 backport?

With Best Regards,
Aleksej

On 03.11.2014 12:14, Se?n Coffey wrote:
> Approved pending a peer review of the JDK7u changes.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 01/11/2014 22:19, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please, approve a JDK 7u-dev backport of tzdata2014i integration fix. 
>> The fix is almost identical to JDK8 with one difference: there is no 
>> generic names in JDK7 and changes related to them are not applicable.
>> The JPRT build and all related timezone tests passes, JTREG tests 
>> also shows no failure.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Aleksej
>>
>> JDK7 changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8059206/7/webrev.00
>> JDK9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/539a30f006f3
>> Review thread: 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-October/001566.html
>> JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059206
>


From yuka.kamiya at oracle.com  Wed Nov  5 02:56:05 2014
From: yuka.kamiya at oracle.com (Yuka Kamiya)
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:56:05 +0900
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for approval: 8059206: (tz) Support
 tzdata2014i
In-Reply-To: <545935D6.2010100@oracle.com>
References: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com> <5457476F.5050902@oracle.com>
	<545935D6.2010100@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <545991C5.1000907@oracle.com>

Hi,

The fix for 7u looks ok to me.

Thanks,
--
Yuka

On 2014/11/05 5:23, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I ask for the review of this almost-unaltered JDK7 backport?
>
> With Best Regards,
> Aleksej
>
> On 03.11.2014 12:14, Se?n Coffey wrote:
>> Approved pending a peer review of the JDK7u changes.
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> On 01/11/2014 22:19, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Please, approve a JDK 7u-dev backport of tzdata2014i integration 
>>> fix. The fix is almost identical to JDK8 with one difference: there 
>>> is no generic names in JDK7 and changes related to them are not 
>>> applicable.
>>> The JPRT build and all related timezone tests passes, JTREG tests 
>>> also shows no failure.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Aleksej
>>>
>>> JDK7 changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8059206/7/webrev.00
>>> JDK9 chageset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/539a30f006f3
>>> Review thread: 
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-October/001566.html 
>>>
>>> JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059206
>>
>


From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Wed Nov  5 10:13:52 2014
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 13:13:52 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> [7u-dev] Request for approval: 8059206: (tz) Support
 tzdata2014i
In-Reply-To: <545991C5.1000907@oracle.com>
References: <54555C6E.80907@oracle.com> <5457476F.5050902@oracle.com>
	<545935D6.2010100@oracle.com> <545991C5.1000907@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5459F860.1050507@oracle.com>

Yuka,
Thank you for reviewing this fix.

Best Regards,
Aleksej

On 11/05/2014 05:56 AM, Yuka Kamiya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The fix for 7u looks ok to me.
>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Yuka
>
> On 2014/11/05 5:23, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can I ask for the review of this almost-unaltered JDK7 backport?
>>
>> With Best Regards,
>> Aleksej
>>
>> On 03.11.2014 12:14, Se?n Coffey wrote:
>>> Approved pending a peer review of the JDK7u changes.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 01/11/2014 22:19, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please, approve a JDK 7u-dev backport of tzdata2014i integration 
>>>> fix. The fix is almost identical to JDK8 with one difference: there 
>>>> is no generic names in JDK7 and changes related to them are not 
>>>> applicable.
>>>> The JPRT build and all related timezone tests passes, JTREG tests 
>>>> also shows no failure.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Aleksej
>>>>
>>>> JDK7 changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8059206/7/webrev.00
>>>> JDK9 chageset: 
>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/539a30f006f3
>>>> Review thread: 
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2014-October/001566.html 
>>>>
>>>> JBS bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059206
>>>
>>
>


From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Wed Nov 12 23:47:43 2014
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Subject: <i18n dev> JEP 226: UTF-8 Property Files
Message-ID: <20141112234743.946524207D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/226

- Mark

From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Thu Nov 13 00:13:50 2014
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:13:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: <i18n dev> JEP 227: Unicode 7.0
Message-ID: <20141113001350.D58B54207F@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/227

- Mark

From steven.loomis at oracle.com  Thu Nov 13 04:38:19 2014
From: steven.loomis at oracle.com (Steven R. Loomis)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:38:19 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> JEP 227: Unicode 7.0
In-Reply-To: <20141113001350.D58B54207F@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20141113001350.D58B54207F@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <546435BB.5010609@oracle.com>

Very good!

There's one Unicode release a year, so they are a bit more predictable.

-s
On 11/12/2014 4:13 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/227
>
> - Mark


From martijnverburg at gmail.com  Fri Nov 14 14:29:05 2014
From: martijnverburg at gmail.com (Martijn Verburg)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:29:05 +0100
Subject: <i18n dev> JEP 226: UTF-8 Property Files
In-Reply-To: <20141112234743.946524207D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20141112234743.946524207D@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <CAP7YuAR4D_Q6Ga+sj5cPp6vSPbpFJGgVgzOB2ySf+pUHM4BtXQ@mail.gmail.com>

Totally looking forward to using this - language property files will become
so much easier!

Cheers,
Martijn

On 13 November 2014 00:47, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:

> New JEP Candidate: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/226
>
> - Mark
>

From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Mon Nov 17 00:11:01 2014
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:11:01 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> RFR: 8064914: tzdb.dat compilation failure when using
	tzdata2014j
Message-ID: <54693D15.5040204@oracle.com>

Hello,

During the latest tzdata (2014j) integration the tzdb.dat build failure 
was observed - details can be found in JBS [1].
The proposed [2] fix resolves time zones double link problem and JDK 
compilation is succedded.
Can I ask a review for this fix, please?

Thank you,
Aleksej

[1] Bug URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064914
[2] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8064914/9/webrev.00

From aleksej.efimov at oracle.com  Mon Nov 17 00:13:23 2014
From: aleksej.efimov at oracle.com (Aleksej Efimov)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 03:13:23 +0300
Subject: <i18n dev> RFR: 8064560: (tz) Support tzdata2014j
Message-ID: <54693DA3.30908@oracle.com>

Hi,

Please, review [1] tzdata2014j integration to JDK9 [2]. It is a 
straight-forward tzdata update, but new data caused a tzdb.dat build 
failure.
It was reported under different bugId [3], there is a possible fix for 
that and request for review was sent [4].
Testing:
JPRT: jdk_other jdk_util jdk_text jdk_time
JTREG tests: test/sun/util/calendar test/java/util/Calendar 
test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone test/sun/util/calendar 
test/java/util/TimeZone test/java/time test/java/util/Formatter 
test/closed/java/util/Calendar test/closed/java/util/TimeZone 
test/closed/java/text/Format/DateFormat

Thank you,
Aleksej

[1] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8064560/9/webrev.00/
[2] Bug URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064560
[3] Build failure bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064914
[4] Build failure RFR: 
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-November/029677.html 


From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Mon Nov 17 02:45:19 2014
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:45:19 +0900
Subject: <i18n dev> RFR: 8064560: (tz) Support tzdata2014j
In-Reply-To: <54693DA3.30908@oracle.com>
References: <54693DA3.30908@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5469613F.7000903@oracle.com>

Looks good to me.

Masayoshi

On 11/17/2014 9:13 AM, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please, review [1] tzdata2014j integration to JDK9 [2]. It is a 
> straight-forward tzdata update, but new data caused a tzdb.dat build 
> failure.
> It was reported under different bugId [3], there is a possible fix for 
> that and request for review was sent [4].
> Testing:
> JPRT: jdk_other jdk_util jdk_text jdk_time
> JTREG tests: test/sun/util/calendar test/java/util/Calendar 
> test/sun/util/resources/TimeZone test/sun/util/calendar 
> test/java/util/TimeZone test/java/time test/java/util/Formatter 
> test/closed/java/util/Calendar test/closed/java/util/TimeZone 
> test/closed/java/text/Format/DateFormat
>
> Thank you,
> Aleksej
>
> [1] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8064560/9/webrev.00/
> [2] Bug URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064560
> [3] Build failure bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064914
> [4] Build failure RFR: 
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-November/029677.html 
>


From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Mon Nov 17 09:39:32 2014
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:39:32 +0000
Subject: <i18n dev> RFR: 8064914: tzdb.dat compilation failure when
	using tzdata2014j
In-Reply-To: <54693D15.5040204@oracle.com>
References: <54693D15.5040204@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <5469C254.30109@oracle.com>

Looks fine. Thanks for handling.

regards,
Sean.

On 17/11/2014 00:11, Aleksej Efimov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> During the latest tzdata (2014j) integration the tzdb.dat build 
> failure was observed - details can be found in JBS [1].
> The proposed [2] fix resolves time zones double link problem and JDK 
> compilation is succedded.
> Can I ask a review for this fix, please?
>
> Thank you,
> Aleksej
>
> [1] Bug URL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8064914
> [2] Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8064914/9/webrev.00


From michael.fang at oracle.com  Tue Nov 18 03:31:17 2014
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:31:17 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [9] Review request for 8055798: Japanese translation for
 a warning from javac looks incorrect.
Message-ID: <546ABD85.7060304@oracle.com>

Hi,

Please help to code review the changes for the following CR for jdk9:
8055798: Japanese translation for a warning from javac looks incorrect.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055798

The webrev is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8055798/webrev.9/

thanks,

-michael

From yuka.kamiya at oracle.com  Tue Nov 18 04:35:01 2014
From: yuka.kamiya at oracle.com (Yuka Kamiya)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:35:01 +0900
Subject: <i18n dev> [9] Review request for 8055798: Japanese translation
 for a warning from javac looks incorrect.
In-Reply-To: <546ABD85.7060304@oracle.com>
References: <546ABD85.7060304@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <546ACC75.1040609@oracle.com>

Hi Michael,

The fix looks good to me.

Thanks,
--
Yuka


On 2014/11/18 12:31, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR for jdk9:
> 8055798: Japanese translation for a warning from javac looks incorrect.
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055798
>
> The webrev is located at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8055798/webrev.9/
>
> thanks,
>
> -michael


From michael.fang at oracle.com  Tue Nov 18 04:40:00 2014
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 20:40:00 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [9] Review request for 8055798: Japanese translation
 for a warning from javac looks incorrect.
In-Reply-To: <546ACC75.1040609@oracle.com>
References: <546ABD85.7060304@oracle.com> <546ACC75.1040609@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <546ACDA0.1010801@oracle.com>

Thanks Yuka.

-michael

On 14?11?17? 08:35 ??, Yuka Kamiya wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> The fix looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Yuka
>
>
> On 2014/11/18 12:31, Michael Fang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR for jdk9:
>> 8055798: Japanese translation for a warning from javac looks incorrect.
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055798
>>
>> The webrev is located at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8055798/webrev.9/
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -michael
>

From michael.fang at oracle.com  Tue Nov 25 19:20:47 2014
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:20:47 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8065069: jdk8u40 l10n resource
 file translation update 2
Message-ID: <5474D68F.8030701@oracle.com>

Hi,

Please help to code review the changes for the following CR:
8065069: jdk8u40 l10n resource file translation update 2
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065069

The webrev is located at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8065069/

thanks,

-michael

From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Wed Nov 26 05:19:47 2014
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:19:47 +0900
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8065069: jdk8u40 l10n
 resource file translation update 2
In-Reply-To: <5474D68F.8030701@oracle.com>
References: <5474D68F.8030701@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <547562F3.2040106@oracle.com>

Hi Michael,

What's the reason to make the change? A drawback of the change would be 
that the Chinese locale names are no longer grouped together when the 
locale names are sorted in ja locale. The following are the old and new 
names sorted in ja locale.

old:
???
???
???(???)
???(???)
???

new:
??????
???
???
???
??????

Masayoshi

On 11/26/2014 4:20 AM, Michael Fang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR:
> 8065069: jdk8u40 l10n resource file translation update 2
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065069
>
> The webrev is located at:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8065069/
>
> thanks,
>
> -michael


From michael.fang at oracle.com  Wed Nov 26 17:21:49 2014
From: michael.fang at oracle.com (Michael Fang)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:21:49 -0800
Subject: <i18n dev> [8u40] Review request for 8065069: jdk8u40 l10n
 resource file translation update 2
In-Reply-To: <547562F3.2040106@oracle.com>
References: <5474D68F.8030701@oracle.com> <547562F3.2040106@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <54760C2D.6040903@oracle.com>

Hi Masayoshi,

Thank you for your review comment. This was a regular translation update 
from translation team for each release. Typically if they change the 
translation, it's either to improve glossary consistency or improve 
translation quality/accuracy.

I am discussing with translation team whether we should keep existing 
translation.

thanks,

-michael

On 14?11?25? 09:19 ??, Masayoshi Okutsu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> What's the reason to make the change? A drawback of the change would 
> be that the Chinese locale names are no longer grouped together when 
> the locale names are sorted in ja locale. The following are the old 
> and new names sorted in ja locale.
>
> old:
> ???
> ???
> ???(???)
> ???(???)
> ???
>
> new:
> ??????
> ???
> ???
> ???
> ??????
>
> Masayoshi
>
> On 11/26/2014 4:20 AM, Michael Fang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please help to code review the changes for the following CR:
>> 8065069: jdk8u40 l10n resource file translation update 2
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065069
>>
>> The webrev is located at:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mfang/8065069/
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -michael
>