<i18n dev> [9] RFR: 8058509: CLDRLocaleDataMetaInfo should be in jdk.localedata

[Naoto Sato]

Yes, the current plan is to make the CLDR's data the default one, only 
when it is available. Requiring it in the java.base would be problematic 
for smaller environments. This will be addressed in 8008577.

Naoto

On 9/16/14, 9:50 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
> At one point you mention that CLDR will become the default in JDK 9.
> Would you need to move them back to java.base when it becomes the default?
>
> Mandy
>
> On 9/16/14 9:30 AM, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> CLDR's data is accessible only when cldrdata.jar is available,
>> including their "en" resources. There is no need to put their "en"
>> resources in java.base.
>>
>> Naoto
>>
>> On 9/15/14, 6:11 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/15/2014 4:30 PM, Naoto Sato wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please review the fix for the following issue:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058509
>>>>
>>>> The webrev is located at:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8058509/webrev.0/
>>>>
>>>> The fix is intended to move the LocaleDataMetaInfo of CLDR from
>>>> java.base module to jdk.localedata module, along with CLDR's "en"
>>>> locale data and the package name change to avoid the "split package"
>>>> in two modules.
>>>
>>> Should CLDR's en locale data be available when cldrdata.jar is not
>>> present?
>>>
>>> Mandy
>>>
>